You may have heard that your blood type can protect you against covid-19, or make you more vulnerable. The science suggests that it can do both, a bit, but researchers say that it is too soon to make decisions about personal risk based on your blood group.
The idea that blood type might influence susceptibility to infection by the coronavirus that causes covid-19 began circulating in March after a team led by Jiao Zhao at The Southern University of Science and Technology in China posted some preliminary results online.
Their starting point was the fact that susceptibility to the virus behind SARS is influenced by blood group, with type O somewhat protective against catching the virus. Other viruses are also blood-group dependent; people with type A blood have been found to be more susceptible to hepatitis B and HIV.
The Chinese team blood-typed 2173 people in hospital with covid-19 and compared them with the general population. This revealed that among people in hospital there were more in blood group A and fewer in blood group O than the general population, which suggests type A was associated with a higher risk of infection and type O with a lower risk.
A few weeks later, Michael Zietz and Nicholas Tatonetti at Columbia University Irving Medical Center in New York found a similar pattern, but only among patients whose blood type was rhesus positive (see “What is a blood type?“, below).
The earlier work on the SARS virus had shown that the protection enjoyed by people with type O blood was due to them already having protective antibodies, which may have been created in response to immunogenic molecules, or antigens, from other pathogens. These antibodies inhibited the SARS virus from latching onto a cell receptor called ACE2, which it uses to break into human cells.
Those antibodies seen in people with type O blood appear to have been elicited by antigens very similar to those on type A blood cells. This could explain why people in the type A blood group don’t have these antibodies: even if they had been exposed to the same pathogens as those people with type O blood, their immune systems would recognise the antigens as “self”.
Given the biological similarity of the SARS virus and the novel coronavirus, both teams of researchers speculate that the same mechanism is behind the protective effect.
However, susceptibility to infection doesn’t necessarily equate to risk of getting seriously ill. “There are two separate questions,” says Anahita Dua at Massachusetts General Hospital. “Number one, is blood type related to susceptibility to the virus? The second is, once you’ve got it, does your blood type make you have a worse outcome?”
On the second question the evidence is “all over the place”, she says, and mostly in non-peer-reviewed research. The New York team, for example, found no association.
Last month, an international collaboration published a peer-reviewed study of 1590 people from Italy and Spain who had gone into respiratory failure while being treated for covid-19. Researchers scanned the patients’ genomes for variants associated with the severity of their disease and found two.
One was a cluster of six genes with several possible links to the disease, including genes that regulate ACE2; the other was the ABO blood group system. The result is “striking”, says Mark Caulfield at the William Harvey Research Institute in the UK, but needs to be replicated.
The latest peer-reviewed research by Dua’s group hasn’t helped to clear up the confusion. She and her team analysed medical data from thousands of people with covid-19 in the Boston area. “We looked at blood type and severe disease and death, and we found no association,” says her colleague Christopher Latz.
However, says Dua, the association cannot be ruled out and, if it is real, would be a useful tool in assessing patients’ prognoses. “But more research is needed to come to a thorough conclusion,” says Latz.
newscientist.com, 23 July 2020
; https://www.newscientist.com/article/2249854-does-your-blood-type-influence-how-susceptible-you-are-to-covid-19/?utm_source=NSNEW&utm_campaign=3f37d1d4a7-nsnew_230720&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_e65fab71ff-3f37d1d4a7-378549783 ”>https://www.newscientist.com