President Trump has nominated toxicologist Michael Dourson, who has published a series of books blending science and the Bible, to head the US Environmental Protection Agencys (EPA) chemical and pesticides office. Dourson quickly came under attack from environmental groups for being too cosy with the tobacco and chemical industries. This role of director of the EPAs Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention requires Senate confirmation. The American Chemistry Council (ACC), an industry trade group, immediately backed the nomination, describing Dourson as an excellent candidate for this important position and highly respected. The organisation urged the Senate to approve his nomination without delay.
In announcing Dourson as Trumps pick for the position, the EPA included copious praise from various quarters. For example, the agency quoted Samuel Cohen, a microbiologist at the University of Nebraska Medical Centre, calling him an outstanding, hard-working scientist with a distinguished record in toxicology and risk assessment. Unusually, the EPA press release also included accolades for the nomination from religious figures. In his profile on Twitter, Dourson had said he writes books matching science and Biblical text, but he apparently changed the language after media attention following his nomination to say that he writes scienceBible stories. Environmental Defence Fund senior scientist Richard Denison described Dourson as having extensive, longstanding ties to the chemical and tobacco industries. He pointed out that the nomination comes at a critical point for the EPA toxics office, which is charged with implementing last years new law that overhauled the 40-year-old regulations that govern chemicals policy in the US. Melanie Benesh, an attorney with the Environmental Working Group, said Dourson has deep ties to the chemical industry he will be tasked with regulating if confirmed. She stated that the non-profit consulting group he founded and leads Toxicology Excellence for Risk Assessment has taken funding from the ACC and other industry players and downplayed the risks of chemical exposure.
Chemistry World, 24 July 2017 ;