Chemical and Physical Exposures in the Emerging US Green-Collar Workforce

“Green collar” workers serve in occupations that directly improve environmental quality and sustainability. This study estimates and compares the prevalence of select physical and chemical exposures among green versus non-green U.S. workers. Data from the U.S. 2010 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) Occupational Health Supplement were linked to the Occupational Information Network (ONET) Database. We examined four main exposures: 1) vapours, gas, dust, fumes (VGDF); 2) secondhand tobacco smoke; 3) skin hazards; 4) outdoor work. Green-collar workers were significantly more likely to report exposure to VGDF and outdoor work than nongreen-collar workers [fusion_builder_container hundred_percent=”yes” overflow=”visible”][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” padding=”” margin_top=”0px” margin_bottom=”0px” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_direction=”left” hide_on_mobile=”no” center_content=”no” min_height=”none”][adjusted odds ratio (AOR)?=?1.25; 95% CI?=?1.11 to 1.40; AOR?=?1.44 (1.26 to 1.63), respectively]. Green-collar workers were less likely to be exposed to chemicals (AOR?=?0.80; 0.69 to 0.92). The authors concluded that green-collar workers appear to be at a greater risk for select workplace exposures. As the green industry continues to grow, it is important to identify these occupational hazards in order to maximise worker health.

Authors: Chen CJ, Moore KJ, Fernandez CA, Arheart KL, LeBlanc WG, Cifuentes M, McClure LA, Christ SL, Fleming LE, Lee DJ, Caban-Martinez AJ. ;Full Source: Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine. 2017 May; 59(5):e91-e96. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001004. ;[/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]