Under the European chemicals’ legislation, REACH, substances that are identified to be of “very high concern” will de facto be removed from the market unless the European Commission grants authorisations permitting specific uses. Companies who apply for an authorisation without demonstrating “adequate control” of the risks have to show by means of a socio-economic analysis (SEA) that positive impacts of use outweigh negative impacts for human health and ecosystems. This study identifies core challenges where further in-depth guidance is urgently required in order to ensure that a SEA can deliver meaningful results and that it can effectively support decision-making on authorisation. In particular, the authors emphasise the need to better guide the selection of tools for impact assessment, to explicitly account for stock pollution effects in impact assessments for persistent and very persistent chemicals, to define suitable impact indicators for PBT/vPvB chemicals given the lack of reliable information about safe concentration levels, to guide how impacts can be transformed into values for decision-making, and to provide a well-balanced discussion of discounting of long-term impacts of chemicals.
Authors: Gabbert S, Scheringer M, Ng C, Stolzenberg HC. ;Full Source: Regulatory Toxicology & Pharmacology. 2014 Sep 8. pii: S0273-2300(14)00193-7. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.08.013. [fusion_builder_container hundred_percent=”yes” overflow=”visible”][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” padding=”” margin_top=”0px” margin_bottom=”0px” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_direction=”left” hide_on_mobile=”no” center_content=”no” min_height=”none”][Epub ahead of print] ;[/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]